Uncomfortable Truths for Osborne’s Ideology Brigade

I make no apology for lifting this straight from the pages of the Guardian today (2 March) because I simply couldn’t rewrite these figures to make the point any clearer. There has been a complete lack of context in the debate over deficit reduction and without a solid factual base, it is impossible to make rational decisions over the action that must be taken. Therefore it is with huge gratitude to Barry Kushner that I replicate his letter here:

“George Osborne dissimulates. He knows that Ed Balls is at odds with Labour party policy on cuts, knowing that we have 12 to 13 years to pay off debt and deficit. But he also knows that our level of debt (less than 60% of GDP net of bank assets) is within Maastricht Treaty limits (60%) and lower than almost all OECD countries; that this debt is low by historical standards (we sustained debt at more than 100% of GDP for 20 years up until the early 1970s); that debt repayments (less than 3% of GDP) are lower than they were under Thatcher (5.15%) and Major (3.8%); that our deficit is partly created by a low overall tax-take (around 36% compared with the EU average of 40%). He knows this because these are official statistics (available on Google – mostly Office for National Statistics but also ukpublicspending.co.uk).
He knows, therefore, that whereas our economy, dominated by manufacturing up to the early 1990s, delivered GDP growth of 2.5%, the financial sector since then has delivered growth rates of less than 1.5% – another element of structural deficit. He knows that, whereas public sector costs have risen year on year over the past 30 years, so has outsourcing to the private sector – currently at around 20% of total public sector resource. Though he may privately be content with Labour’s failure to stem the concentration of wealth (the index of inequality rose under Labour – the Gini Coefficient up almost 5 points), Osbourne will be more circumspect that Labour borrowed less and repaid more debt than previous Conservative administrations (borrowing was roughly 50% less under Blair/Brown than it was under Major – more than twice Thatcher’s debt repayments were made).
And his biggest dissimulation – under the continuing influence of the previous Labour administration, 2010 saw £20bn more than forecast wiped off the deficit as a result not of spending cuts but of “New Deal”-style growth stimulation. It is unremarkable that Osbourne can point to the OECD and IMF supporting cuts – they are the global advocates of public austerity. He does not mention the three Nobel prize-winning economists (Pissaredes, Stiglitz, Krugman) and Martin Wolf of the Financial Times, all of whom condemn this austerity policy as a serious historical error. Why not? Clearly because he wants no balanced public contestation over the sustainability of a public sector. The real question is why opposition parties and dissident Lib Dems allow this level of narrative control by the coalition government – “crisis”, “unavoidable cuts”, “Labour’s fault”. It’s neither “middle” nor “muddle” nor an economic crisis – it’s a crisis of democratic debate.”


Filed under Coalition, Economy

2 responses to “Uncomfortable Truths for Osborne’s Ideology Brigade

  1. Sean O'Hare

    He knows that Ed Balls is at odds with Labour party policy on cuts, knowing that we have 12 to 13 years to pay off debt and deficit

    It may seem strange to you as a young man and to the scouse communist Barry Kushner , but as a much older man who may not be around in 12 to 13 years I would rather that this debt was paid off sooner rather than later. My son and daughter are now in their late 30s and I hate the thought of lumbering them with the tax burden that is now inevitable because of the shrinking tax take from a largely uneducated and unemployable population. All thanks to Labour’s disasterous education and immigration policies.

    Balls got us into this mess. He was allowed to because Brown was economically witless whereas Balls is totally malevolent.

    ..But he also knows that our level of debt (less than 60% of GDP net of bank assets) is within Maastricht Treaty limits (60%) and lower than almost all OECD countries

    The Maastricht Treaty means nothing to me, nor should it to anyone in this country. We the people did not sign up to it or any other EU treaty other than the 1972 European Communities Act an only then because the people were deceived by traitor Heath. The 60% figure was plucked out of thin air by useless bureaucrats. The affordability of personal debt depends on an individual’s circumstances and the prospects of future earnings. This country’s prospects are dismal and the debt burden is therefore unsustainable. In fact I believe it might be terminal and the prospect of default looms large for us as well as Ireland and the PIGS.

    ..it’s a crisis of democratic debate.

    Now that I can agree with. Decocracy has become a farce in this country. While democracy may not be all that it’s cracked up to be the chances of a more libertarian society are zilch so I have to support the former.

  2. What an error though that niether Ed Balls or Ed Milliband seem to be able to steer the debate that we should be having, towards these salient facts. I’m very disappointed with the Labour PR machine that seems ill equiped to counter the false narative that is currently abroard, that most seem to believe, despite an effort in the early days of the coalition Govt. by Labour to counter these ‘lies’. Let’s call them for what they are.
    Currently the only counter that Labour seems to employ is to ignore the statements that are still heard many times a day, that it is all Labour’s fault. Even the cry of a few months ago, that it was the fault of the Bankers, has been silenced by the PR efforts of the Financial sector.
    Labour is therefore failing on these two critical fronts to counter this poisonous narrative. Eddy George is doing a better job.
    Milliband is spending far too much time rallying the troops and ignoring the warfront in Westminster. He must change course.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s